Get Permission Chraibi, Hanine, Cherkaoui, and Soualhi: Ceramic cantilever bridge: A simplified clinical technique


Introduction

The front missing tooth is a real challenge for a dental surgeon, it has to restore the function and esthetic of the front tooth especially when it comes to young subjects, where the implant treatment must be postponed until the patient becomes an adult.

A fixed prosthesis restoration, such as a conventional bridge or a resin bonded bridge (metallic resin bonded bridge or ceramic resin bonded bridge) are the preferred treatment.

Due to the evolution in bonding adhesives, as well as an increasing concern for tissue preservation, the cantilever bonded bridge has found its place in modern dentistry. 1

Historical overview

The conventional bonded bridge with metal framework is placed on both sides of the pontic on the palatal or lingual surfaces of the teeth

This type of prosthetic was described for the first time by Rochette in 1973,2 where its infrastructure was made of metal. In 1997, it was introduced in ceramics by kern and Glaser.3

In 1981, a new configuration requiring only a single retainer was introduced by Hopkins4 and was known since then as the cantilever bridge.

According to the Glossary of Prosthodontics Terms, the cantilever fixed dental prosthesis or cantilever bridge is a fixed complete or partial denture in which the pontic is cantilevered and retained and supported by one or more abutments.5

The cantilever bridge is therefore a plural fixed prosthesis whose pontic replacing the missing tooth is cantilevered. There is no support below the pontic in extension, it is linked to a single wing bonded to the lingual surface of the abutment tooth bordering the gap (Figure 1).

Figure 1

a: Ceramic resin bonded bridge with two retainers; b: Ceramic cantilever bridge with a single retainer

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/63b44e4b-378e-4e25-aa07-e28471e322d2image1.png
Figure 2

Tooth preparation view on CAD/CAM

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/63b44e4b-378e-4e25-aa07-e28471e322d2image2.jpeg

Biomechanics

The support tooth undergoes pressures coming from the element in extension. It acts as a bending lever under the action of occlusal forces.

In vitro, the fatigue resistance of bonded bridges with a single wing is greater than the one with two wings. 6

Also, mobility occurs on a single and unique axis with the cantilever bonded bridge. The bridge constraints are reduced, and the patient's proprioception seems to be improved.

Abutment Selection Criteria

It’s very important to select the right scenario for a cantilever bonded bridge, it’s mostly responsible of the success or the failure of this procedure.

Investigation should be conducted while choosing the abutment teeth, to ensure endodontic and periodontal health. A careful assessment of both static and dynamic occlusal relationships is vital to optimize success. A wax up on articulated casts can be used to get a better perspective from the palatal side, which helps in determining the amount of interocclusal space available for the bridge wings and pontics.

The selection of the abutment tooth depends on 5 parameters (Table 1)

Clinical Realization

The gum preparation or pink preparation:

The aesthetic integration of a cantilever bridge requires creating the illusion that the prosthetic crown emerges from a root.

The practitioner can reshape the edentulous ridge by adding or subtracting bone or mucosa. Scraping off plaster from the casts is prohibited because it would cause an over pressure of the pontic on the patient's gums.

Soft tissue thickness is measured with a periodontal probe between the mucosa and the ridge limit. A retro alveolar radiograph may also be taken. If the variation in tissue volume is not too great and the thickness of the gum exceeds 3mm, the practitioner can model the edentulous ridge by tissue subtraction.

The cervical limit of the pontic collar is marked with a marker to guide the dentist, then the soft tissues are shaped with a ball diamond bur to create a crater.

Gingivectomy can also be performed with a cold blade, electrosurgery, carbon dioxide or diode laser. Tissues are more stable, and healing is improved after laser gingivectomy. (Tirlet et Attal JP, 2015).7

Pseudo-papillae, and zenith point are therefore created as a result of this modeling of the gingival margin.

The aim of the preparation is to provide a sufficient and homogeneous volume for the ceramic ensuring optimal mechanical and aesthetic features also to allow a precise insertion of the restoration.

Temporization of soft tissues

As a temporary, a clear dental splint is used with an acrylic resin tooth or filled with flow composite is placed at the end of the gum preparation. It allows the gum to make a «guided tissue healing» and keeps the created pseudo-papillae it is usually left 10 to 15 days. The composite must be perfectly polished to have good tissue healing. 7

Table 1

Abutment selection criteria (Tirlet and Attal, 2015) 7

Abutment selection criteria

Bonding surface

The central incisor is preferable, then the canine and finally the lateral incisor

Previous restoration

Preferentially a tooth free from restoration

Occlusion

The reconstruction of the bridge makes it possible to create contacts and restore occlusion. Its preferable that the pontic tooth doesn’t have contact in occlusion

Risk of recurrence

In case of mobility, diastema between the central and lateral incisor should be avoided. A diastema between the lateral and the canine is less harmful; Therefore, to replace a lateral incisor, we prefer to use the central incisor. And to replace a central incisor we use the contralateral central incisor

Passive eruption

The abutment tooth must have finished its eruption. It is most often the central incisor in adolescents and not the canine

Table 2

Cantilever bridge tooth preparation steps

Cantilever bridge tooth preparation

Minimal Enamel palatal preparation:

Preparation of cervical abutment: the palatal preparation is limited in the enamel. We seek to obtain the largest enamel surface to improve bonding. The preparation must be 0,5mm if we are using zirconia, and 0.8 to 1 mm if its lithium disilicate ceramic. The occlusal limit should not be located near to the area of high translucency on the coronary edge. This limit must not exceed the line of translucency and be below it to allow the diffusion of light and not alter the aesthetics. We will be particularly vigilant when the abutment is a central incisor, canines are less affected by this problem. The preparation must be located supragingivally, it makes the bonding steps easier in a dry area, using a rubber dam. The practitioner can mark the area not to be crossed with a marker. So, the palatal preparation must cover the widest surface possible to optimize bonding once again. Also, to oppose the forces of cleavage and peeling of the bonded joint.8

Preparation of proximal box

A proximal box is made in extension of the preparation in the toothless area, it is oblique to the axis of the abutment tooth. Therefor the free edge won’t be damaged during the preparation and not to modify its translucency. It shouldn’t be extended to the third of the proximal surface. The proximal box should be 4 mm high and 3 mm wide, it is surface is 12mm2 if we opt for lithium disilicate ceramic because the connection of the bonded bridge is its weak point. But if we don’t have enough surface, we opt for an armature in zirconia 3 mm high and 2-3mm wide (6-9mm2). If we have less surface we opt for metal infrastructure.7, 9, 8, 10

Secondary retention

Secondary retention can be obtained by making small coves. Kern proposes to perform it next to the missing teeth area11 while Tirlet and Attal 12 place it opposite side of the missing teeth. It is located away from the pulp area. This technic allows stabilization and retention of the bridge. It avoids the risk of rotation of the bridge. It opposes the lever arm due to the forces applied to the element in extension. Cingulum or proximal grooves can be made, they ensure the stability, retention, and support of the restoration. 12

Table 3

Ceramic bonding steps

Lithium disilicate Ceramics

Zirconia

Bonding of a lithium disilicate bonded bridge (IPS Emax, Ivoclar) has the same clinical procedure as partial restorations: orthophosphoric acid cleaning after the final clinical try-in of the bridge to remove bacterial contaminants from the wing inner surface. Etching with hydrofluoric acid (4-9%) for 20 seconds of the ceramic wing inner surface, rinsing and drying, finally silane deposit and wait about 3 minutes.

this non-glass cannot be etched and bonded. After try-in and cleaning with alcohol, the zirconia primer is placed into the restorations and then dried.

Tooth surface conditioning

orthophosphoric acid etching 30 seconds for the email and 15 seconds for the dentin under rubber dam, dental bonding adhesive is then applied, air-thinned, and dual-cure composite luting material is applied onto the teeth and the cantilever bridge wing were seated. A Clean-up is done with brushes, finally curing for 40s from both lingual and facial.

Tooth preparation

According to Shillingburg, the preparation principles are: 9 Tissue economy, retention and stabilization of the reconstruction, the durability over time and the precision of the abutment preparation limit (Table 2)

Impression

When the preparation is finished, a one-step impression is taken, the longevity of the bonded bridge depends on the quality of the impression and the quality of the prothesis inner side.

Bonding steps

It is necessary to recheck the perfect adaptation of the bridge before bonding. The problem arises of the choice between the different possibilities we have (Table 3).

Maintenance

The bonded bridge's maintenance is a simple procedure. Cleaning around the bridge with regular and inter-proximal brushes, as well as flossing, is usually recommended. Bridges are also checked on a regular basis as a part of routine checkups.

Conclusion

A single retainer ceramic resin-bonded bridge is an ideal interim fixed dental prosthesis therapy. It can also be employed as a long-term restoration approach, if an appropriate enamel structure is available and adequate framework dimensions are provided, also adhesive cementation procedures are methodically done.

The clinician must make suitable case selections, provide proper treatment planning, and guarantee that treatment is carried out to a high standard, are the success key to this type of fixed prothesis. The clinician must keep in mind that maintenance is essential to guaranty the best chance of effectiveness of the prothesis.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

N U Zitzmann M Özcan S S Scherrer J M Bühler R Weiger G Krastl Resin-bonded restorations: a strategy for managing anterior tooth loss in adolescenceJ Prosthet Dent201511342706

2 

A Rochette Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teethJ Prosthet Dent1973304 Pt 14182310.1016/0022-3913(73)90163-7

3 

M Kern R Gläser Cantilevered all- ceramic, resinbonded fixed partial dentures: a new treatment modalityJ Esthet Dent1997952556410.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00951.x

4 

C Hopkins An immediate cantilever Rochette bridgeBr Dent J19811519292510.1038/sj.bdj.4804691

5 

The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth EditionJ Prosthet Dent20171175S110510.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001

6 

TL Wong MG Botelho The fatigue bond strength of fixed-fixed versus cantilever resin-bonded partial fixed dental prosthesesJ Prosthet Dent201311121364110.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.004

7 

G Tirlet J P Attal Les bridges collés cantilever en vitrocéramique renforcée au disilicate de lithium raisons du choix et mise en oeuvre clinique, réalitésCliniques20152613546

8 

S Wolfart S Eschbach S Scherrer M Kern Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disili- cate glass-ceramic xed den- tal prostheses: up to 8 years resultsDent Mater2009259637110.1016/j.dental.2009.05.003

9 

H T Shillingburg Fundamentals of fixed prosthodonticsQuintessenceChicago1997

10 

M Kern RBFDPs. Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses - Minimally Invasive Esthetic Reliable, 1st Edn.QuintessenceBerlin2017

11 

M Kern N Passia M Sasse C Yazigi Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors20176551510.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.003

12 

J P Attal G Tirlet Le cantilever : une nouvelle géométrie pour les bridges collés. Revue de la littératureRéal Clin20152612534



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 28-04-2022

Accepted : 28-05-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jds.2022.013


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1351

PDF Downloaded: 286