- Visibility 219 Views
- Downloads 15 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.jds.2024.017
-
CrossMark
Biopsy: The benchmark for diagnostic excellence amidst advanced technological advancements – A review
- Author Details:
-
Varun Rastogi *
-
Nisha Maddheshiya
-
Dilasha Dhungel
-
Sandhya Chaurasia
Varun Rastogi *
Nisha Maddheshiya
Dilasha Dhungel
Sandhya Chaurasia
Introduction
In 1966, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined biopsy as "The examination of tissue removed from a lesion." The term "biopsy" has its origin from two Greek words, where "bios" means life and "opsis" means vision, indicating a minor surgical procedure to extract tissue from a living organism.[1] Biopsy serves two primary purposes: establishing a definitive diagnosis to guide treatment and assessing prognosis by confirming whether the affected tissue has been completely removed with clear margins. Histopathological diagnosis, traditionally the most precise, solidifies biopsy's status as the gold standard among diagnostic and investigative procedures. [1], [2]
Although advanced imaging and investigative techniques have lessened the need for biopsies in some areas, biopsy remains essential for diagnosing mucosal lesions in the oral cavity. In dentistry, it's common for practitioners to treat oral lesions without a biopsy, and excised tissue is not always sent for histopathological examination. [3] However, it is crucial that all tissue removed from oral lesions undergo histologic evaluation. [4]
This paper discusses the key aspects of biopsy procedures for oral lesions, covering indications, contraindications, biopsy types, procedural guidelines, potential errors, and diagnostic challenges. It aims to equip general dentists with insights to enhance patient treatment options.
Oral lesions are common, and biopsy decisions depend on the situation. Some require immediate biopsy, others after follow-up, while some may not be biopsied due to potential complications associated with the underlying conditions. This paper aims to guide oral health professionals on when biopsy is indicated or contraindicated to prevent complications.[5], [6] These indications and contra – indications are as follows:
Indications
When an ulcer or growth persisting for more than 2 weeks, without any identifiable cause.
Any lesion suspected to be of inflammatory origin but is unresponsive to treatment even after 2 weeks.
Red or white lesion clinically suspected as potentially malignant
Any lesion suspected to be a cyst or neoplasm
Oral lesions of controversial etiology, especially when they are associated with pain or paresthesia
Patients having cancer phobia
Chronic reactive or inflammatory lesions like gingival growths
Lesions that interfere with mastication or speech like tori or fibrous hyperplasia
Recurrent mucosal lesions or suspicious changes in pre-existing lesions
Material from a persistent intraoral or extraoral draining sinus the source of which cannot be identified.
Any tissue surgically excised
Contra-indications
Systemically ill and debilitated patient
Presence of acute viral or bacterial infection
Hypermelanotic lesion suspected to be malignant melanoma (Only excisional biopsy done
Vascular lesions where hemostasis may be a problem
Parotid salivary gland neoplasm (only excisional biopsy done
Awareness on Types of Biopsy and Procedural Intricacies
The subsequent crucial aspect for an oral health professional is gaining an understanding of the various biopsy techniques and procedures. Oral biopsies can be categorized based on the technique employed, the tools used, the type of tissue sampled, and the timing of the biopsy. A simplified overview of the procedures involved in oral biopsies to assist in the oral health professional’s comprehension of this vital aspect are as follows:
Technique used: [7], [8], [9]
Incisional biopsy: when only a particular representative part of a lesion is removed. [[Figure 1]A]
Excisional biopsy: when the entire lesion and a small margin of normal tissue is removed. It is the ideal treatment for small lesions (<1cm) [[Figure 1]B].
Imprint/ Touch biopsy: also known as touch preparation or scrape cytology, is a diagnostic technique used to assess lymph nodes for the presence of abnormal cells, particularly in cases where lymph node involvement is suspected due to infection or cancer.
Curettage biopsy: also known simply as "curettage" is a medical procedure that involves scraping or cleaning out body cavities for various purposes, including tissue sampling for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons.
Tru –cut needle biopsy: is a medical procedure used to obtain a core of tissue sample of about 2 mm in thickness from bony lesions for the diagnosis and assessment of bone abnormalities, including bone tumors, cysts, or other bone-related conditions.
Armamentarium or material used: [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]
Brush biopsy: also known as a ‘transepithelial brush biopsy’ or simply "brush biopsy," is a non-invasive diagnostic method used to detect cell atypia, particularly in potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity. This technique involves gently brushing the surface of the oral mucosa or lesion with a special brush-like instrument designed to capture superficial epithelial cells. These collected cells are then examined under a microscope to assess for any signs of cell atypia or abnormal changes. [[Figure 1]C]
FNAB (Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy): is a diagnostic procedure commonly used for a variety of purposes, including the evaluation of intra-osseous cysts, tumors, and salivary gland lesions. [[Figure 1]D]
Exfoliative cytology: also known as ‘oral cytology’, is a diagnostic technique that involves the microscopic examination of shed or desquamated epithelial cells from the surface of mucous membranes, particularly in the oral cavity. This method is commonly used for the detection of various oral conditions, including oral dysplasia.
Punch Biopsy: A punch biopsy is a medical procedure in which a small, cylindrical piece or "chunk" of tissue is removed from a suspected lesion or abnormal area for diagnostic purposes, to determine the nature of the lesion, whether it's benign, precancerous, or malignant. [[Figure 1]E]
Forceps: This instrument developed by Bermejo, histopathological [14]
Electrocautery: This approach offers the advantage of maintaining a bloodless field during the biopsy procedure because it cauterizes (seals) blood vessels, which can help improve visibility and reduce bleeding. However, it is important to be aware that there is also a potential risk of thermal damage associated with cauterization.
LASER: A soft tissue LASER scalpel, commonly CO2 LASER is used for and there is a lack of hemorrhage during the procedure. [[Figure 1]F]
Type of lesional tissue: [1]
Direct biopsy: is performed when the lesion is readily visible on the oral mucosa and can be easily accessed with a scalpel or other surgical instruments directly from the mucosal surface.
Indirect biopsy: is conducted when the lesion is not directly visible on the oral mucosa's surface and is instead covered by what appears to be normal-looking mucosal tissue. In this case, the clinician takes a tissue sample from the seemingly healthy mucosa surrounding the lesion
Time of the biopsy: [16]
Pre - operative biopsy: are conducted before surgery and are aimed at diagnosing a lesion or condition that requires surgical intervention.
Intra-operative biopsy: are performed during surgery itself. Surgeons may perform an intra-operative biopsy to confirm the nature of a lesion, ensure clear margins, or guide the extent of the surgical resection.
Post – operative biopsy: are conducted after surgery, typically as a follow-up procedure. These biopsies are aimed at checking the efficiency of the treatment and guide further management or adjustments as needed.
Miscellaneous [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]
Ultrasound guided needle biopsies: also known as ‘ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsies’, are a medical procedure that combines the use of ultrasound imaging with a fine needle to obtain tissue samples from specific areas of the body (soft tissues and organs).
Stereotactic core biopsies: are a specialized medical procedure used primarily in the field of radiology to obtain tissue samples from suspicious or abnormal areas, particularly in the breast.
Endoscopic biopsies: also known as endoscopic mucosal biopsies or endoscopic tissue sampling, are medical procedures performed using an endoscope to obtain tissue samples from the interior of various body cavities, such as the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, respiratory system, and urinary tract.
Bone marrow biopsies: is a medical procedure used to obtain a sample of bone marrow tissue for diagnostic purposes. It is primarily performed to evaluate and diagnose various blood disorders, such as aplastic anemia, leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and certain immune system disorders.
Preliminaries of the Biopsy Procedure
Before performing a biopsy procedure, there are several important preliminaries and preparatory steps that need to be taken to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. These preliminary steps may vary depending on the type of biopsy, the location of the lesion, and the patient's overall health. [23] [Table 1] summarizes some of the common preliminaries for a biopsy procedure.
|
Preliminaries |
Description |
|
Patient Evaluation |
Evaluation of the patient's medical history, including any underlying health conditions, allergies, medications, and previous surgeries or procedures. |
|
Informed consent |
The healthcare provider discusses the purpose, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the biopsy procedure with the patient. |
|
Anesthesia |
The type of anesthesia to be used (local, regional, or general) is determined based on the biopsy location and the patient's comfort and safety. |
|
Imaging |
Imaging studies such as X-rays, CT scans, ultrasound, or MRI may be conducted before the biopsy to precisely locate the lesion or target area and guide the procedure. |
|
Biopsy site markings |
The biopsy site may be marked or identified using imaging guidance, skin markers, or other methods to ensure accurate targeting. |
|
Monitoring |
The patient's vital signs, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation, may be monitored throughout the procedure, especially if anesthesia is administered. |
|
Post – biopsy care |
Post-biopsy care instructions and potential complications are discussed with the patient. |
Disinfection of the Biopsy Site & Administration of Local Anesthesia
Disinfection and local anesthesia are crucial steps before a biopsy. The biopsy site should be disinfected with a non-iodinated antiseptic to avoid staining, and a local anesthetic like lidocaine should be used to numb the area, ensuring patient comfort and a sterile environment. These measures are essential for minimizing infection risk and procedural discomfort. [24]
The biopsy procedure
The biopsy procedure is a medical technique for obtaining tissue samples for diagnostic, investigative, or therapeutic purposes. The specific steps vary based on the biopsy type and tissue location. [4], [25] Instruments and materials used can include standard surgical tools like scalpels, tissue forceps, and scissors, as well as specialized equipment such as punches, B-forceps, electrocautery, and lasers [[Figure 1]G]. [Figure 2] gives a general overview of the common steps involved in a biopsy procedure.
The steps and techniques of a biopsy can vary based on the clinical context, tissue location, and biopsy type. The primary goal is to obtain a representative and diagnostic tissue sample while minimizing patient discomfort and reducing the risk of complications.
Biopsy artefacts
Biopsy artifacts can significantly impact the accuracy of histopathologic diagnosis. These artefacts may occur at various stages of the biopsy process, from the initial collection of the tissue sample to its processing and examination in the pathology laboratory. [26], [27] [Table 2] presents a comprehensive list of various artefacts that can occur during oral biopsy procedures, potentially affecting the accuracy of histopathological diagnoses.
|
Artefacts |
Description |
Prevention |
|
1. Anoxia or Agonal changes |
• Due to delay in fixation resulting in mitochondrial damage • Nuclear pyknosis, karyolyis and karyorrhexis with cytoplasmic vacuolation |
Tissue should be stored by 400 C or by rapid fixation |
|
2. Split artefact |
Occurs when the tissue sample is not properly handled or prepared, and it appears to be split or divided when viewed under a microscope. |
Handle biopsy specimens carefully and follow proper tissue processing and sectioning protocols. |
|
3. Crush artefact |
Occurs due to improper pressure while handling the tissue using forceps, scissors or scalpel resulting in cell distortion, nuclear streaking and cellular degeneration. |
It is essential to handle tissue specimens with care and precision, including the use of appropriate instruments and gentle handling. |
|
4. Compression artefact |
Due to minimal compression of the tissue, tissues can become distorted, displaying irregular serrated edges with cells that appear crushed and dark chromatin strands within their nuclei. |
Handle the specimen carefully |
|
5. Curling artefact |
• more common in incisional biopsy • Due to the small size of the oral biopsy specimens, the tissue is not oriented properly during embedding procedure |
Position the specimen with its mucosal surface facing upwards on a sterile piece of paper and ensuring adequate depth of specimen is achieved in biopsy specimens |
|
6. Foreign body artefact |
• Cotton fibers resemble fungal hyphae or appear as eosinophilic, resembling amyloid-like or black substances that exhibit polarization when viewed under polarized light. • Starch granules are characterized by their refractive properties, polygonal shape, positive staining with PAS (Periodic Acid-Schiff) stain, and a size range of 5 to 20 millimeters in diameter. They bear a resemblance to atypical epithelial cells. |
Using rubber gloves alternately and accurately identifying foreign materials in biopsy specimens. |
|
7. Fulgeration artefact |
• When electrocautery is used, tissue protein coagulation may occur due to the heat generated and results in an amorphous appearance of the tissues. • With the use of LASER and electrocautery, the epithelial cells appear detached with a spindled, palisading configuration of the nuclei, separation of the epithelium from the basement membrane and amorphous opaque appearance of the muscle, fat and fibrous connective tissue |
To prevent this issue, it's advisable to maintain a gap between the incisional margin and the boundary of the lesion and utilize a cutting electrode when collecting the specimen. |
|
8. Forceps artefact |
Occurs when the tooth forceps penetrates the specimen resulting in tears or voids along with compression of the stroma |
• Avoid tooth forceps • Use B forceps • Proper care when taking the specimen |
The biopsy performa
When a biopsy is sent to the oral pathologist for histopathological analysis, a biopsy form is used. This form should include the reason for the biopsy and details such as the site, size, shape, color, texture, consistency, clinical presentation, associated signs or symptoms, lymph node status, and any systemic diseases [[Figure 3] ]. The provisional or differential diagnosis should also be recorded. Sometimes, a diagram showing anatomical sites may be included, and surgical margins should be marked with silk sutures to aid in specimen orientation and margin identification. We have designed a flowchart that may serve as a pathway for oral health professionals to follow in order to obtain an accurate biopsy sample [[Figure 4]].[28], [29]
Complications Following Biopsy
As a dental practitioner and oral health practitioner, it is essential to be aware of potential complications from biopsy procedures and to discuss these with the patient beforehand. Common complications include postoperative bleeding, infections, nerve damage leading to paresthesia or anesthesia, pain, swelling at the biopsy site, and damage to adjacent structures or tissues. Thorough documentation and patient discussion are crucial for effective management and informed consent. [30]
Open and transparent communication with patients about potential complications, along with obtaining informed consent, is crucial before performing oral biopsies. Dentists and oral health professionals should also have a comprehensive plan to manage and mitigate these complications if they arise. This proactive approach ensures patient safety and effective post-biopsy care. [31]
The histopathologic diagnosis
There are 3 ways in which the pathologist may report the diagnostic biopsy: [1]
Definitive diagnosis: When distinctive features of a disease, such as squamous cell carcinoma with well-defined margins, tissue infiltration, invasion depth, and comprehensive histological grading, are observed, a definitive diagnosis can be made.
Incompatibility diagnosis: When essential diagnostic criteria are missing and clinical correlation is lacking, it is crucial to investigate potential sampling or processing errors.
Orientative diagnosis: When a pathologist cannot reach a definitive diagnosis, they may describe the observed histopathological features. It is important to emphasize that these findings should be clinically correlated or further investigated to support a conclusive diagnosis.
Conclusion
Oral biopsies are commonly conducted diagnostic procedures, particularly for various oral lesions, including potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer. However, despite their apparent simplicity, these procedures require careful planning and expertise to yield valuable diagnostic insights. Achieving a successful biopsy involves several key considerations, such as accurate site selection, precise incision depth within the tissue, and proper handling and processing of the collected tissue. Crucially, the effectiveness of this diagnostic procedure as the gold standard hinges on the collaborative efforts of a multidisciplinary team, including the oral physician, oral radiologist, oral surgeon, and oral pathologist. Their coordinated work ensures that patients receive the most accurate and comprehensive assessment, facilitating appropriate treatment and care.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- S Hunasgi, A Koneru, V Manvikar, R Amrutha, KMP Reddy. Oral biopsy in general dental practice. J Adv Clin Res Insights 2017. [Google Scholar]
- RJ Melrose, JP Handlers, S Kerpel, DJ Summerlin, J Tomich, RJ Melrose, JP Handlers, S Kerpe, CJ Tomich;. The use of a biopsy in the dental practice: The position of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Gen Dent 2007. [Google Scholar]
- RGS Phulari, MD Takvani, D Vasavada, P Agrawal. Attitude towards oral biopsy among general dental practitioners of Vadodara, a city in Western state of India. Stoma Edu J 2022. [Google Scholar]
- RJ Oliver, P Sloan, MN Pemberton. Oral biopsies: methods and applications. Br Dent J 2004. [Google Scholar]
- RM Shanti, T Tanaka, DC Stanton. Oral Biopsy Techniques. Dermatol Clin 2020. [Google Scholar]
- R Brown, WK Bottomley, K Abramovitch, RP Langlais. Immediate biopsy versus a therapeutic trial in the diagnosis and treatment of vesiculobullous/vesiculoerosive oral lesions. Opposing viewpoints presented. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992. [Google Scholar]
- LA Julien, RP Michel. Imprint cytology: Invaluable technique to evaluate fresh specimens received in the pathology department for lymphoma workup. Cancer Cytopathol 2021. [Google Scholar]
- DR Tollafield, LM Merriman, WA Turner, LM Merriman. 6 - Operative techniques. Clinical Skills in Treating the Foot 2005. [Google Scholar]
- S Lalita, T Harikrishnan, ED Azariah, D Chandrasekaran. Tru-cut needle biopsy: A novel approach in the diagnosis of solid oral pathologies. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- FW Neumann, H Neumann, S Spieth, TW Remmerbach. Retrospective evaluation of the oral brush biopsy in daily dental routine - an effective way of early cancer detection. Clin Oral Investig 2022. [Google Scholar]
- AP Santos, NN Sugaya, CAL Junior, DSP Junior. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the oral cavity and head and neck region. Braz Oral Res 2011. [Google Scholar]
- R Verma, A Singh, M Badni, A Chandra, S Gupta, R Verma. Evaluation of exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of oral premalignant and malignant lesions: A cytomorphometric analysis. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015. [Google Scholar]
- SL Avon, HB Klieb. Oral soft-tissue biopsy: an overview. J Can Dent Assoc 2012. [Google Scholar]
- A Bermejo-Fenoll, P López-Jornet. Instrument for biopsy of oral lesions: an improved chalazion forceps. Dermatol Surg 2006. [Google Scholar]
- MM Bornstein, C Winzap-Kälin, DL Cochran, D Buser. The CO2 laser for excisional biopsies of oral lesions: a case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Y Wu, J Sang, J Zhou, Y Fang. Comparative analysis of differences between preoperative endoscopic biopsy and postoperative pathological examination for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia. J Int Med Res 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- CP Lo, CY Chen, SC Chin, KW Lee, CJ Hsueh, CJ Juan. Detection of suspicious malignant cervical lymph nodes of unknown origin: diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy with nodal size and central necrosis correlate. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007. [Google Scholar]
- C Burke, R Thomas, C Inglis, A Baldwin, K Ramesar, R Grace. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the head and neck. A 9-year experience. Br J Radiol 2011. [Google Scholar]
- S Chakrabarthi. Stereotactic breast biopsy: A review & applicability in the Indian context. Indian J Med Res 2021. [Google Scholar]
- RR Walvekar, A Razfar, RL Carrau, B Schaitkin. Sialendoscopy and associated complications: a preliminary experience. Laryngoscope 2008. [Google Scholar]
- R Nadda, R Repaka, N Mallik, AK Sahani. A prospective survey on trephine biopsy of bone and bone marrow: an experience with 274 Indian patients' biopsies. Eur J Med Res 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- DK Filippiadis, G Charalampopoulos, A Mazioti, K Keramida, A Kelekis. Bone and Soft-Tissue Biopsies: What You Need to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018. [Google Scholar]
- SP Khoo. Oral biopsies in the dental practice-The pathologist’s perspective. Ann Dent Univ Malaya 1995. [Google Scholar]
- YH Wang, DR Wang, JY Liu, J Pan. Local anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A review of current opinion. J Dent Sci 2021. [Google Scholar]
- GD Dockery, BW Bakotic. Biopsy techniques. Lower Extremity Soft Tissue & Cutaneous Plastic Surgery 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- V Rastogi, N Puri, S Arora, G Kaur, L Yadav, R Sharma. Artefacts: a diagnostic dilemma - a review. J Clin Diagn Res 2013. [Google Scholar]
- K Kumar, DC Shetty, M Dua. Biopsy and Tissue Processing Artifacts in Oral Mucosal Tissues. Int J Head Neck Surg 2012. [Google Scholar]
- T Vyas. Biopsy of Oral Lesion-A Review Article. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2018. [Google Scholar]
- KMK Masthan, SL Sankari, NA Babu, JP Rajguru. How to Help the Oral Pathologist in Making an Accurate Diagnosis. J Clin of Diagn Res 2013. [Google Scholar]
- A C Jenzer, T Pepper. Oral Surgery, Biopsies. [Updated 2023 Jul 17]. In: Stat Pearls [Internet]. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- J Kusukawa, Y Suefuji, F Ryu, R Noguchi, O Iwamoto, T Kameyama. Dissemination of cancer cells into circulation occurs by incisional biopsy of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Introduction
- Awareness on Types of Biopsy and Procedural Intricacies
- Technique used: [7], [8], [9]
- Armamentarium or material used: [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]
- Type of lesional tissue: [1]
- Time of the biopsy: [16]
- Miscellaneous [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]
- Preliminaries of the Biopsy Procedure
- Disinfection of the Biopsy Site & Administration of Local Anesthesia
- Complications Following Biopsy
- Conclusion
- Source of Funding
- Conflict of Interest