- Visibility 121 Views
- Downloads 77 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.jds.70016.1759125422
-
CrossMark
Comparative evaluation of marginal fit, prosthodontic and patient centered outcomes of milled zirconia crown using conventional and digital impression techniques – A split mouth, randomized clinical trial
- Author Details:
-
Neha Singla
-
Pankaj Datta *
-
Gita Rani
-
Siddhi Tripathi
-
Nupur Chaudhary
-
Sunil Pal
Neha Singla
Pankaj Datta *
Gita Rani
Siddhi Tripathi
Statement of problem: Advancements in restorative dentistry, especially all-ceramic restorations, have improved aesthetics, biocompatibility, and durability. The emergence of digital impression techniques has sparked debate over their clinical efficiency and accuracy compared to conventional methods in fabricating zirconia crowns.
Objectives: 1. To evaluate the marginal fit of zirconia crowns fabricated using conventional and digital impressions; 2. To assess prosthodontic outcomes between the two techniques; 3. To compare patient-centered outcomesacross both groups.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients requiring zirconia crowns for contralateral mandibular posteriorteeth were selectedand divided into two groups: Group A (conventional impression) and Group B (digital impression). Crowns were fabricated using CAD/CAM. Marginal fit was assessed using a stereomicroscope (40X magnification), prosthodontic outcomes via USPHS criteria, and patient satisfaction using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were analysed with SPSS v26 (p < 0.05).
Results: Digital impressions resulted in superior marginal fit, better occlusal contacts, and improved colour matching. Patient satisfaction was higher in the digital group. Both groups produced clinically acceptable crowns, but digital impressions showed fewer marginal discrepancies and better overall prosthodontic outcomes.
Conclusion: Digital impression techniques offer greater accuracy, efficiency, and patient comfort compared to conventional methods. Given their superior performance in key clinical parameters, they represent a preferred approach in contemporary prosthodontic practice.
References
- Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: A preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(2):80–90.
- Sakornwimon N, Leevailoj C. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients’ preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(3):386–91.
- Tang Z, Zhao X, Wang H, et al. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations. Medicine. 2019;98(40):e17385.
- Tabesh M, Nejatidanesh F, Savabi G, Davoudi A, Savabi O, Mirmohammadi H. Marginal adaptation of zirconia complete- coverage fixed dental restorations made from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta- analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(4):603–10.
- Yucel MT, Aykent F, Avunduk MC. In vitro evaluation of the marginal fit of different all- ceramic crowns. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(3):225–30.
- Elrashid AH, Alkahtani AH, Alqahtani SJ, Alajmi NB, Alsultan FH. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal fit of E.Max press and E.Max computer-aided design and computer- assisted manufacturing lithium disilicate ceramic crowns: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(2):178–84.
- Meirowitz A, Bitterman Y, Levy S. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:103.
- Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):555–60.
- Mörmann WH, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Sener B, Attin T, Mehl A. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;20:113–25.
- Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all- ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(4):799–806.
- Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–8.
- Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(1):111–5.
- Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in- vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide- partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23(1):45–
- Brewer JD, Garlapo DA, Chipps EA, Tedesco LA. Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(6):631–4.
- Patterson PW, Mclundie AC, Stirrups SR, Taylor WG. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(3):402-6.
- Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(1):18–32.
- Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Hillis SL. Clinical assessment of high- strength all- ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(4):396–401.
- Chevalier J, Deville S, Münch E, Jullian R, Lair F. Critical effect of cubic phase on aging in 3 mol% yttria- stabilized zirconia ceramics for hip replacement prosthesis. Biomaterials. 2004;25(24):5539–45.
- Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Marginal and Internal Fit of All ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Two Different CAD/CAM Systems. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(3):422-6.
- Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: Basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007;35(11):819–26.
- Krishna JV, Kumar VS, Savadi RC. Evolution of metal-free ceramics. J Indian Prosthodontist Soc. 2009;9(2):70–5.