- Visibility 148 Views
- Downloads 77 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.jds.11009.1665271553
-
CrossMark
Prosthetic replacement and occlusal efficacy – A systematic review
- Author Details:
-
Gowtham Neppala
-
Suresh Venugopalan *
-
Abinaya Kannan
Suresh Venugopalan *
Abinaya Kannan
Aim: To assess the occlusal efficacy of CAD-created occlusal anatomy and hand layered occlusal anatomy in fixed dental prosthesis using Digital occlusal analysis (T-scan) in literature.
Methods and Materials: To find the studies under consideration, detailed search plans were created for each database used (i.e. PubMed central, Google and Hand Search) till January 2022. Studies that compare different materials for CAD-CAM crowns, studies using digital occlusal analysis, studies comparing occlusal and disocclusal timing using T-scan, clinical trials and prospective studies were considered for this review.
Results: Out of 119 articles obtained from the electronic search, 97 were excluded because their titles and abstracts were not related to the topic, and 10 were excluded due to missing important data. In the end, 12 articles were reviewed. The PRISMA chart shows how the articles were chosen for this review, which compared prosthetic replacement and occlusal efficacy using a digital occlusal analysis.
Conclusion: This review concludes that the studies considered have a high risk of quality bias. However, results of included studies concluded that there was a significant difference in using T-scan for occlusal equilibration for fixed dental prosthesis – CAD-created and hand layered occlusal anatomy and is a reliable tool as it shows the Occlusal and Disocclusal Timing and the Intensity of Contact load in percentage compared with the traditional articulating paper. Hence further clinical trials need to be conducted with proper sample size calculation, blinding and randomization to obtain accurate results.
References
- Poggio C, Manfredini D. Does increasing vertical dimension of occlusion in centric relation affect muscular activity? An electromyographic study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;36(1):231–8
- Bryant SR. The rationale for management of morphologic variations and nonphysiologic occlusion in the young dentition. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(4):284–7.
- Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, Barmak AB, Gallucci GO, Att W, et al. Artificial intelligence models for tooth-supported fixed and removable prosthodontics: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):276–92.
- Risciotti E, Squadrito N, Montanari D, Iannello G, Macca U, Tallarico M, et al. Digital Protocol to Record Occlusal Analysis in Prosthodontics: A Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(5):1370.
- Fang JJ, Kuo TH. Tracked motion-based dental occlusion surface estimation for crown restoration. Comput Aided Des. 2009;41(4):315–23.
- Mehl A. A new concept for the integration of dynamic occlusion in the digital construction process. Int J Comput Dent. 2012;15:109–
- Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJY, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012;4(1):7–12.
- Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J. 2007;1:1–7.
- Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D, Weiner S. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;85(1):18–22.
- Kerstein DM, Robert B, editors. Handbook of research on computerized occlusal analysis technology applications in dental medicine. IGI Global 2014;1093. DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-6587-3
[Google Scholar] - Lin PT, Jiao Y, Zhao SJ, Wang F, Li L, Yu F, et al. Occlusion and Disocclusion Time Changes in Single Unit Crowns Designed by Functional Generated Path Technique: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):388.
- Chaithanya R, Sajjan S, Raju AVR. A study of change in occlusal contacts and force dynamics after fixed prosthetic treatment and after equilibration - Using Tekscan III. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019;19(1):9–19.
- Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):770–7.
- Qureshi, Nafeesa, and Zahid Imran. Principles and concepts of occlusion in restorative dentistry. Int J Oral Craniofacial Sci. 2023;9(1):1–7.
- Yurkstas AA, Albert Yurkstas A. The Masticatory Act. A Review. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:248–62.
- Lee HS, Ko KH, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Correlation between occlusal contact area at various levels of interocclusal thicknesses and masticatory performance. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49(5):522–8.
- Patil SR, Maragathavalli G, Ramesh DN, Agrawal R, Sahu R, Alam MK. Bite force: A contemporary narrative review. Int J Health Sci Res. 2022;12(5):108–16.
- Ayuso‐Montero R, Mariano‐Hernandez Y, Khoury‐Ribas L, Rovira‐ Lastra B, Willaert E, Martinez‐Gomis J. Reliability and validity of T‐scan and 3D intraoral scanning for measuring the occlusal contact area. J Prosthod. 2020;29(1):19–25.
- Saraçoğlu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(5):522–6.
- Dawson PE. Functional Occlusion: from TMJ to Smile Design. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2006;648.
- Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 8th edition, Mosby. 2019.
- Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators. A descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(9):1280–6. 176 Neppala et al. / Journal of Dental Specialities 2025;13(2):171-176
- Kihara T, Shigeta Y, Hirabayashi R, Ikawa T, Ando E, Hirai S, et al. Influence of filler on bite impression material in transillumination method for occlusal examination. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):144–9.
- Chowdhary R, Sonnahalli NK. Clinical applications of the t-scan quantitative digital occlusal analysis technology asystematic review. Int J Comput Dent. 2024;27(1):49-86.
- Venugopalan S, Maiti S, Nallaswamy D, Nesappan T. T-Scan: Streamlining Occlusal Verification. J Ind Acad Oral Med Rad. 2023;35(4):614–6.
- Cerna M, Ferreira R, Zaror C, Navarro P, Sandoval P. In vitro evaluation of T-Scan®III through study of the sensels. Cranio. 2015;33(4):299–305.
- Iyer PK, Venugopalan S, Thiyaneswaran N, Jebaraj S. T-scans in implant procedures. Bioinformation. 2023;19(1):35–8.
- Venugopalan S. Retrospective analysis of immediate implants: a prism with a different dimension. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(2):51–4.
- Abinaya Kannan, Suresh Venugopalan. Evaluating The Effect Of Pressure Exerted During Mechanical Cord Packing Using A Custom-Made Pressure Indicating Device A Randomised Clinical Trial. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci. 2021;8(6):2698–705.
- Jeong MY, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Comparison of two computerized occlusal analysis systems for indicating occlusal contacts. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(2):49–54.
- Rane V, Hamde S, Agrawal A. Development of computerized masticatory force measurement system. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41(1):65–71.
- Zhang R, Ding Q, Sun Y, Zhang L, Xie Q. Assessment of CAD- CAM zirconia crowns designed with 2 different methods: A self- controlled clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(5):686–92.
- Rahman L, Kumar P, Kalavathy N, Shetty M, Sanketh A, Roopa M. Digital occlusal analysis of bite force distribution in partially edentulous patients before and after prosthetic rehabilitation: An in vivo study. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2021;12(4):204.
- Ramsundar K, Rengalakshmi S, Venugopalan S, Jain RK, Nagesh S. Electromyographic assessment of the masseter and temporalis muscles in skeletal II malocclusion subjects with varying overjets: a pilot study. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44645.
- Devi S, Nallaswamy D, Venugopalan S. Prosthetic Occlusal Analyzers - A Comprehensive Review. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2021;8(7):3550–54.